Much as I dislike Gladwell’s distrust of the internet as a tool for positive change, there’s truth in his words here that is too often forgotten:
This I think is true, not just of writers, but of anyone who is in a creative space, that you have to reverse the normal human tendency, which is to edit. So a lot of… and occasionally this is, I think, a source of a great deal of frustration that exists between people in creative and non-creative universes, which is that creative people I think are trying to… their lives and their brains, their brains are messy. Their imaginations are messy. Why, because they don’t want to throw anything out. Why don’t they want to throw anything out? Because they believe on some level that there is always something of interest or value in whatever they encounter. They know enough about how mysterious and serendipitous and unpredictable the creative process is that they realize that it’s dangerous to kind of make too hasty a judgment about the value of anything that they come across.
I think he should stick to writing and speaking about art and literature rather than technology.
Watch the video here.
Something nice about the way ‘dwell’ and ‘Gladwell’ fit, I feel!
I was at Malcolm Gladwell Live
last night. I’m a big fan of his writing, especially these recent articles of his in the New Yorker: the one one late bloomers
, the one on big ideas
and the one on the uses of adversity.
I also liked what he had to say at the 2008 New Yorker Conference about the challenge of hiring in the modern world
, as well as his TED discourse on happiness via spaghetti sauce
(if that sounds harebrained, it isn’t!). So yes, you get it. I’m a fan.
About yesterday, I can say this: the guy is entertaining. He is not a performer par excellence or anything, but there’s something to be said for the way he weaves his anecdotes into his main thesis, which in this case was based on his new book The Outliers
. The essence of the book is that where you come from – your background and your culture, determine the way you communicate, even if you are unaware of it. Most of his talk centred around a particular instance of a Colombian plane crashing in New York in 1990 – I guess you’ll have to read the book to know more (am I selling his book or aren’t I!!). Initially I thought he was saying what Nassim Nicholas Taleb
says about the probability of the improbable, but soon enough Gladwell’s point veered far enough from that to stand on its own. I don’t think the ENTIRE book will be have anything radically novel to say, especially if you’ve read most of the stuff he writes. Bits of it might. I think it will be well worth a read anyway, given his style of writing. I’m pretty sure I’ll read it – I’ll wait for the book to come out in paperback though.